FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF DEVICES(SCREEN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND MACINTOSH) FOR PASSING TUBE IN AIRWAY AND ITS EFFECTS.

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY TO COMPARE AND EVALUATE THE HAEMODYNAMIC DERANGEMENTS USING SCREEN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE AS INTUBATING DEVICES IN ADULT PATIENTS.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/01/030476
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-01-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signs Health Condition 2: null- UNDERGOING ELECTIVE SURGERY

Interventions

Control Intervention1: SCREEN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE: COMPARISON OF HAEMODYNAMIC DERANGEMENTS TWICE A WEEK FOR 6 MONTHS Control Intervention2: MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE: COMPARISON OF HAEMODYNAMIC DERANGEMEN

Sponsors

DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade I & II patients. Age between 20-60 years Weight between 40-70 kg Patients with either sex Patients planned for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with previous history of multiple/ failed intubation. Patients with predicted difficult laryngoscopy except for all class of MP Grades Patients with any pathology of the oral cavity that may obstruct the insertion of device Mouth opening less than 2.5cm. Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare the haemodynamic changes i.e. difference in Mean arterial blood pressure(MABP) and Heart rate using Screenvideo laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope as an intubating aid.Timepoint: Immediately after intubation,1 minute, 3 minute and 5 minute after intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Success rate of intubation 2. Time taken for intubation 3. Maneuvers needed for successful intubation 4. Ease of intubation 5. Number of attempts taken for intubation 6. Complications if any Timepoint: 2 YEARS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactQAZI EHSAN ALI

JNMC

qaziehsanali@gmail.com7417701769

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026