Skip to content

Insertion of a endotracheal breathing tube into trachea with the help of a supratracheal breathing devices I-gel Vs Ambu Auragain

Blind endotracheal intubation with I-gel Vs Ambu Auragain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/01/030390
Enrollment
90
Registered
2021-01-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Blind intubation through supraglottic airway devices I-gel: After proper counseling and permission from patient with proper preparation for surgery, the patient will be premedicated and

Sponsors

VIMSAR
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients of age group 18-65 2. American society of anesthesiologists grade 1&2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient refusal 2. Mouth opening less than 3 centimetres 3. Patients with severe obstructive or restrictive lung diseases 4. Airway pathology 5. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the success rates of blind endotracheal intubation between I-gel Vs Ambu AuragainTimepoint: 5 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess hemodynamic changes and other complications during the procedureTimepoint: 10 mins

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Malaya Kumar Patel

VIMSAR

patelmalaya@gmail.com7008331622

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026