Treatment Of Gingival Recession By VISTA And CAF Techniques Along With The Use Of PRF

comparative evaluation of Vestibuar Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access vs Coronally Advanced Flap with Platelet Rich Fibrin in Millers Class I gingival recession defects.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/01/030379

Enrollment

Registered

2021-01-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access With Platelet Rich Fibrin: Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access Is A Recession Coverage Technique And Platelet Rich Fibrin Is

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patients with no contraindications for periodontal surgery and who had not taken medications known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing. 2. Exhibiting presence of Millerâ??s Class I gingival recession. 3. Absence of caries and periapical radiolucency. 4. Willing to comply with the study related procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previously failed surgical attempts to correct the gingival recession. 2. Previous lack of cooperation with maintenance program. 3. Mucosal disorders like high frenal attachments. 4. Mal-aligned and restored teeth. 5. Smokers, alcoholics or patients with tobacco chewing habits. 6. Medically compromised patients. 7. Pregnant and lactating females.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of vestibular incision sub-periosteal tunnel access and coronally advanced flap along with platelet rich fibrin in Millerâ??s class I gingival recession.Timepoint: Baseline 3 Months 6 Months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To evaluate the clinical outcome of coronally advanced flap with platelet rich fibrin for root coverage in Millerâ??s class I gingival recession defects. 2. To evaluate the clinical outcome of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with platelet rich fibrin for root coverage in Millerâ??s class I gingival recession defects. 3. To compare and evaluate the treatment outcomes of CAF and VISTA with PRF in treatment of Millerâ??s class I gingival recession defects.Timepoint: Baseline 3 Months 6 Months	—

Measure

Time frame

1. To evaluate the clinical outcome of coronally advanced flap with platelet rich fibrin for root coverage in Millerâ??s class I gingival recession defects. 2. To evaluate the clinical outcome of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access with platelet rich fibrin for root coverage in Millerâ??s class I gingival recession defects. 3. To compare and evaluate the treatment outcomes of CAF and VISTA with PRF in treatment of Millerâ??s class I gingival recession defects.Timepoint: Baseline 3 Months 6 Months

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNidhi Pandey

Institute of Dental Sciences Bareilly

drmanju75@rediffmail.com8126644491

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026