Comparative evaluation of post- op pain after irrigant activation techniques and Conventional needle irrigation

Comparative evaluation of post- operative pain after two irrigant activation techniques with Conventional Needle irrigation â?? A double blinded randomized controlled clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/01/030329

Enrollment

150

Registered

2021-01-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Irrigant activation techniques: Passive ultrasonic irrigation Laser activated Irrigation Control Intervention1: Conventional needle irrigation: 27 gauge side vented needle

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria Healthy patients Symptomatic irreversible pulpits Pain score ranging from moderate to severe 4-10 on VAS scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had analgesic within last 12 h Systemic illness Drug allergy Pregnancy Lactation Calcified canal Periodontal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Post operative pain after irrigation activation using VAS scaleTimepoint: After 6, 24, 48 hours	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess the correlation between Post operative pain and Analgesic intake in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible PulpitisTimepoint: After 24 hours	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNivedhitha MS

Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Dental college

nivedhithamallisureshbabu@gmail.com9840912367

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026