Skip to content

A comparative evaluation of two different approaches for lumbar transforaminal epidural injection in patients with lumbar radiculopathy

A comparative evaluation of Kambins triangle approach versus Safe triangle approach for lumbar transforaminal epidural injection in patients with lumbar radiculopathy - A prospective, randomised, double blind study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/01/030167
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-01-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G549- Nerve root and plexus disorder, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: kambins triangle approach for lumbar transforaminal epidural injection: kambins triangle approa

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Lumbar radiculopathy 2. ASA I, II, III 3. Scheduled for transforaminal epidural injection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hypertension Patients on steroid Coagulopathy Previous knee exploration � ASA IV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
TO COMPARE THE FLUOROSCOPY GUIDED SUBPEDICULAR APPROACH AND THE APPROACH USING KAMBINS TRIANGLE IN TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL INJECTION PERFORMED IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL STENOSIS COMPLAINING OF LUMBAR RADICULAR PAIN in terms of pain relief and functional improvementTimepoint: 1st January, 2021 to 30th June, 2021

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to investigate and compare the intra procedure complications and post procedure side effects for both the approach.Timepoint: 01.01.2020 to 30.06.2020

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rajasree Biswas

RG Kar MCH

docrajasree@gmail.com9433875954

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026