Skip to content

Comparison of laparoscopic herniotomy with open herniotomy in young males with indirect inguinal hernia

Comparison of laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniotomy with open herniotomy in young males with indirect inguinal hernia- A randomized controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/12/029867
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-12-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniotomy: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniotomy alone without mesh placement +/- repair of widened deep ring (Nyhus category 2) using non absorbable sut

Sponsors

Department of Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Unilateral indirect inguinal hernia of clinical Nyhus category 1 and 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Recurrent hernias 2. Complicated inguinal hernias 3. Any patient found intraoperatively having a weak posterior wall needing reinforcement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
RecurrenceTimepoint: 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Any other complicationTimepoint: 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months;Duration of hospital stayTimepoint: 1 day;Post operative painTimepoint: At discharge, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months;Time taken to resume activities of daily livingTimepoint: 1 week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShreya Agarwala

Maulana Azad Medical College

anubhav.vindal@gmail.com9968604403

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026