Skip to content

Evaluation of regenerative procedures on vital mandibular posterior teeth

Comparative evaluation of gel based regenerative scaffolds in vital pulpotomy procedures on mandibular posterior teeth- A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/12/029804
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-12-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Vital pulpotomy procedure in mandibular posterior teeth: Vital pulpotomy procedure using platelet rich fibrin as regenerative scaffold Control Intervention1: Vital pulpotomy procedure i

Sponsors

Dilshad Mandviwala
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 15 to 50 years Healthy individuals without systemic disease or allergies Teeth permanent mandibular posterior teeth Individuals with pulpitis or trauma or Iatrogenic exposure of pulp during deep caries management Caries Deep occlusal caries (ICDAS score 5 or 6) On vertical and horizontal percussion: Negative response Pulp vitality tests: Vital after Cold test and Electric Pulp Testing Colour of Haemorrhage while performing pulpotomy Bright red colour Periapical status on Radiograph No periapical widening ( Score 1 of Orstavik Periapical Index)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with systemic disease or allergies Individuals on opioid or steroid therapy or antibiotic medication Teeth with Marginal periodontitis or crestal bone loss Proximal carious lesions Internal or external resorption Calcified canals Mobility Swelling or Sinus opening Tenderness to percussion or palpation Excessive bleeding after access cavity preparation not controlled after several minutes or no bleeding at all

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare post procedural pain (Vas scale) between two groupsTimepoint: 48 hours 7 days 3 months and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare for the clinical success rate between two groups. To compare the radiographic outcomes To compare the overall success rate between two groups Timepoint: 48 hours 7 days 3 months and 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sonali Kapoor

Manubhai Patel Dental College and hospital and ORI

docsonali@gmail.com9825323057

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026