Skip to content

Video modeling as a treatment technique for autism children

DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF MIXED VIDEO MODELING MATERIAL ON SOCIAL (PRAGMATIC) COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN CHILDREN WITH ASD

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/12/029580
Enrollment
9
Registered
2020-12-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: F840- Autistic disorder

Interventions

Intervention1: mixed video modeling: Pre-Intervention (Baseline) Two outcome measurements Direct and Indirect will be administered initially with Communication act and function profile questionnaire (

Sponsors

Reshmi M
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children should be diagnosed as mild to moderate Autism Spectrum Disorder by qualified clinical psychologist using CARS (Schopler, Reichler & Renner, 1988) or by ADOS â?? 2 certified health professionals (Lord, Rutter, DiLavore, Risi, Gotham, Bishop, Luyster & Guthrie, 2012). 2. Chronological age should be between 3-6 years. 3. Communicative Act & Function Profile Questionnaire (Lavya, 2012, Appendix 1) will be administered by the investigator to the parents by asking questions regarding the childrenâ??s social communicative function and frequency of their responses. 4. Those who are attending and not attending both will be considered for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Children with visual deficit and /or hearing Impairment on informal evaluation. 2. Severely impaired IQ, severe sensory and behavioral issues, h/o associated problems (seizure).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Direct outcome measure- measuring the direct response to the goal, which is done by Communication act and function profile questionnaire (Lavya, 2012)Timepoint: In baseline, 3 direct outcome measurements taken, (every consecutive week one measurement). In intervention , every 3 goals 7th session, direct outcome measurement taken to check the pass criteria. On failing the pass criteria, 3 goals will be repeated and measurement will be taken. At the end when all the 6 goals achieved, measurement will be taken. In follow up 1week, 2nd week and 1 month post intervention and 2 days after follow up in generalization phase.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Indirect outcome measurement tell whether our mixed video modeling intervention have any indirect role in improving the overall developmental status of children with ASD, done by Communication DEALL development checklist (Karanth, 2007) Timepoint: In baseline, 3 measurements taken (every consecutive week one measurement). In intervention, every 3 goals 7th session, measurement will be taken only when child pass the criteria in direct outcome. On failing the pass criteria, 3 goals will be repeated and measurement taken, only when child passes the criteria. At the end when all the 6 goals achieved, measurement will be taken again. In follow up 1week, 2nd week and 1 month post intervention and 2 days after follow up in generalization phase.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactReshmi M

Manipal College of Health Professions Manipal Academy of Higher Education

vrajaithal@manipal.edu9380495415

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026