Skip to content

use of subglottic suction drainage endotracheal tube in critically ill patients

Comparison of subglottic secretion drainage endotracheal tubes of two different manufacturers used in critically ill patient on mechanical ventilation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/11/029389
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-11-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J22- Unspecified acute lower respiratory infection

Interventions

Intervention1: Subglottic sucton drainage endtracheal tube (SSD-ETT): SSD-ETT from different manufacturers are used and compared with standard ETT For the incidence of VAP. Control Intervention1: Stan

Sponsors

Indira Gandhi Institut of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Patients aged 18 - 65 yrs of either sex b) Patient who will undergo for oro-tracheal intubation c) Intubation required for > 48 hours d) Willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a) Patients aged 65 yrs b) Already tracheostomized patients c) Outside intubated patients d) Death of patients within 48 hours e) Patients needed isolation like tuberculosis, Hepatitis-B, Hepatitis-C and HIV-I & II f) Refusal of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
incidence of Ventilator associated pneumonia with the use of SSD-ETT from differentmanufacturersTimepoint: 28 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
total days on ventilator no of days of icu stay ease of insertion of SSD-ETT from different manufacturersTimepoint: 2 weaks ater intubation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMumtaz Hussain

I.G.I.M.S.

drhussain72@yahoo.co.in9473376853

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026