FindTrial
Sign In

Insertion of tube in the respiratory pathway using two different types of laryngoscope used for introduction

A Comparative Study of Haemodynamic Response Following Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation with Direct Laryngoscope versus Video Laryngoscope Intubation in Patients Undergoing General Anaesthesia - -

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/11/029369
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-11-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventionally endotracheal intubation: Mac intosh laryngoscopes size 3 or 4. Duration - Baseline, 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 10 mins Control Intervention1: Video laryngoscope: D blade video

Sponsors

Self funded
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia,Patients aged above 18 â?? below 60 years, Both gender, ASA 1 and 2, Mallampatti class I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy,BMI > 35,Emergency surgery, Conditions causing raised intra cranial pressure, ASA above 3, Mallampatti III and IV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the haemodynamic response following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with direct laryngoscope versus video laryngoscope intubation in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.Timepoint: Baseline, 1,2,3,5,10 min—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Haemodynamic parameterTimepoint: Baseline, 1 min, 2 min, 5 mins and 10 mins—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactR Arun Kumar

PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research

shivaaniarun76@gmail.com09944113440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026