Comparison of 2 different operations - minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery - for 1-2 cm sized kidney stones

A Prospective comparative study of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of solitary 1-2 cm renal calculi

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/11/029321

Enrollment

Registered

2020-11-24

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N200- Calculus of kidney Health Condition 2: N200- Calculus of kidney

Interventions

Intervention1: Minipercutaenous nephrolithotomy: Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy will be performed under general anesthesia. Patients will be first placed in dorsal lithotomy position and urethrocyst

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Any subject with solitary 1-2 cm renal calculus

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Concomitant ureteral pathology Abnormalities in structure of kidney Abnormalities in body habitus which can hinder positioning

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of operating time between minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgeryTimepoint: At the end of study, that is, at 80 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare stone free rates between the two groups To compare hospital stay between the two groups To compare fluoroscopic exposure between the two groups To compare pain score between the two groups To compare auxiliary procedure rate between the two groups To compare stent insertion rate between the two groups To compare post-operative complications between the two groups Timepoint: At the end of study, that is at 80 weeks	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare stone free rates between the two groups To compare hospital stay between the two groups To compare fluoroscopic exposure between the two groups To compare pain score between the two groups To compare auxiliary procedure rate between the two groups To compare stent insertion rate between the two groups To compare post-operative complications between the two groups Timepoint: At the end of study, that is at 80 weeks

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSukhdev D B Singh

Christian Medical College

ektasantosh@cmcvellore.ac.in04162282111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026