Skip to content

Effectiveness of high flow oxygen administered through nose vs the usual oxygen technique through mask applied over face in patients undergoing shock treatment.

Effectiveness of Hands-free Trans-nasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) over conventional facemask ventilation technique for oxygenation patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/11/029274
Enrollment
200
Registered
2020-11-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring

Interventions

Intervention1: High flow nasal oxygen (THRIVE ) group.: Same patients who have received Shock therapy with convention standard face mask anaesthesia during their third or fourth ECT session will be en

Sponsors

Balaji V
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. All patients between 3rd and 5th session of ECT will be recruited. 2. ASA status 1 and 2. 3. Age group between 18 to 50 years 4. Body mass index of less than 40 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the incidence of oxygen desaturation between the two techniquesTimepoint: Baseline ,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the hemodynamic disturbances and the time to recovery between the two techniques.Timepoint: Hemodyamic disturbances- Baseline , during ECT and post ECT Time to recovery - Tme to full consciousness post Shock application in both the techniques

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBalaji V

NIMHANS ,Bangalore

drvjramesh@gmail.com9844432607

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026