Longevity of Glass ionomer Type IX and RMGIC restorative materials using different surface treatments

EFFECT OF CONVENTIONAL v/s LASER CONDITIONING OF DENTIN FOR SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF GLASS IONOMER RESTORATIVE MATERIALS IN PRIMARY MOLARS-AN IN VITRO STUDY

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Observational

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/11/029014

Enrollment

Registered

2020-11-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and conventional conditioning of dentin restored with Type IX and Light cure GIC: Group I: Conventional conditioning and Type IX GIC Group II: Er,Cr:YSGG Laser

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Non-Carious primary molars 2.Teeth with intact buccal or lingual surfaces that are exfoliated due to physiologic reasons 3.Teeth which are indicated for extraction for orthodontic or therapeutic reasons

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Teeth with multi-surface caries 2.Hypoplastic or developmental defects 3.Teeth with restorations

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Determining the effect of conventional and LASER conditioning on shear bond strength of the GIC restorative materials in primary molarsTimepoint: 1 year	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
effect Shear bond strength between laser conditioning and conventional conditioning on dentinTimepoint: 1 year	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Hrishida P

Rajarajeswari dental college and hospital

shaanrathna@gmail.com984558177

Outcome results