FindTrial
Sign In

To compare two treatment methods (LASER and classical) for upper frenectomy

Comparative evaluation of wound healing after Frenectomy by conventional method or by LASER assisted surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/11/028797
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-11-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z764- Other boarder to healthcare facility

Interventions

Intervention1: Test group (LASER assisted surgery) compared with control group (conventional method): LASER (Test group) : The area will be anaesthetized with a local infiltration by using 2% lignocai

Sponsors

JSS Academy of Higher education and reearch
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects within age group of 18 to 26 years. Good oral hygiene at the time of the surgery. Only maxillary anterior frena were included in this study. All subjects were systemically healthy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects being treated with antiinflammatories, antibiotics and analgesics. Pregnant or lactating women. Having any type of suspicious oral lesions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Healing IndexTimepoint: on day of surgery, 7days,14days,1month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
VAS pain scoreTimepoint: on day of surgery, 7days,14days,1month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMedha Sharma

JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research

deepikamysore@yahoo.co.uk09902066073

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026