Skip to content

A Study with perampanel as a treatment in children and adults with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome who have poorly controlled seizures.

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial With an Open-Label Extension Phase of Perampanel as Adjunctive Treatment in Subjects at Least 2 years of Age With Inadequately Controlled Seizures Associated With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/10/028718
Enrollment
142
Registered
2020-10-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G408- Other epilepsy and recurrent seizures

Interventions

Intervention1: Perampanel: Single daily dose administration of perampanel given as multiple oral 2-mg tablets to give a dose of 2 mg/day to 8 mg/day (randomization phase) or up to 12 mg/day (Extension

Sponsors

Eisai Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects must have diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) 2. At least 2 years old at the time of consent/assent 3. Age of LGS onset must be 4. Must have an average of at least 2 drop seizures per week in the 4-week Baseline Period 5. Must be taking 1 to 4 concomitant anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) at a stable dose for at least 30 days before Visit 1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Presence of progressive neurological disease 2. Presence of drop seizure clusters where individual seizures cannot be reliably counted 3. Prior treatment with perampanel with discontinuation due to safety issues related to perampanel or recent treatment with perampanel within 30 days before Screening 4. Scheduled for epilepsy-related surgery or other surgery during the study 5. Status epilepticus within 12 weeks before Screening 6. Current use of felbamate of less than 1 year, or with dose changes within 60 days before Screening, or history of hematological/hepatic function test abnormalities or other indication of hepatic/bone marrow dysfunction while receiving felbamate. 7. Current or recent use of vigabatrin within 5 months of Screening, or history of vigabatrin-associated clinically significant abnormality in an automated visual perimetry test 8. Intermittent use of benzodiazepine of more than 4 single administrations in the month before Screening 9. Psychotic disorders or unstable recurrent affective disorders evident by use of antipsychotics or prior suicide attempts within approximately the last 2 years 10. Use of AEDs not recommended by Epilepsy Treatment Guidelines for use in LGS 11. Any suicidal ideation with intent with or without a plan within 6 months before Randomization Visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To demonstrate that perampanel given as adjunctive antiepileptic treatment is superior to placebo in reducing the incidence of drop seizures in subjects with inadequately controlled seizures associated with LGSTimepoint: Median percent change in drop seizure frequency per 28 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To demonstrate that perampanel adjunctive treatment is superior to placebo in reducing the incidence of all seizures in subjects with inadequately controlled seizures associated with LGSTimepoint: Median percent change in total seizure frequency per 28 days;To demonstrate that perampanel adjunctive treatment is superior to placebo in reducing the incidence of non-drop seizures in subjects with inadequately controlled seizures associated with LGSTimepoint: Median percent change in non-drop seizure frequency per 28 days;To demonstrate that perampanel adjunctive treatment is superior to placebo in the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates for drop seizures in subjects with inadequately controlled seizures associated with LGSTimepoint: 50% responder rate for drop seizures Others: 75% and 100% responder rates for drop seizures ;To demonstrate that perampanel adjunctive treatment is superior to placebo in the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates for total seizures in subjects with inadequately controlled seizures associated with LGSTimepoint: 50% responder rate for total seizures Others: 75% and 100% responder rates for total seizures ;To evaluate physicians’ global evaluation of subjects’ overall changes in symptoms Physicians’ global evaluation of the subject’s overall changes in symptomsTimepoint: Physicians’ global evaluation of the subject’s overall changes in symptoms;To evaluate the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates in non-drop seizure frequencyTimepoint: 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates for non-drop seizures;To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships of perampanel as adjunctive therapy in subjects with inadequately controlled seizures associated with LGSTimepoint: Model-derived average perampanel concentrations at steady state (Cav,ss);To evaluate the safety of perampanel relative to placebo as adjunctive therapy in subjects with inadequately controlled seizures associated with LGSTimepoint: Incidence of A

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, United States of America

Contacts

Public ContactRashmi Chitgupi

PPD Pharmaceutical Development India Private Limited

Rashmi.Chitgupi@ppdi.com912266022900

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026