Health Condition 1: R99- Ill-defined and unknown cause of mortality
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Dental implant: Surgical placement of dental implant in maxillary and mandibular arch
Intervention2: Dental implant,restoration: immediate loading, type of restoration
Control Intervent
Sponsors
Rajiv Gandhi University of health science
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1) Complete arch edentulous in both maxillary and mandibular arches 2) Patients who were wearing conventional complete denture in maxillary and mandibular arch and those who were not 3) Patients in whom the available bone height was a minimum of 14-16 mm and width of 5mm of width 4) Patients who had an adequate inter-arch space of 14-18mm. 5) A patient who agreed for a follow-up of 5 years.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients in whom immediate extraction and placement of implants was carried out. 2)Those patients in whom the grafting procedure was required. 3) Patients with bone diseases. 4) Patients who wanted an overdenture 5) Patients who wished to have more than 3 implants in the maxillary arch and 2 implants in mandibular arch for full arch restoration, respectively.6) Patients with Unrealistic expectations, unable to commit for follow-up.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| primary outcome measures, implant survival and prosthetic survival were evaluated based the long-term survival. Implant survival included clinical stability, patient-reported function without any discomfort, infection, and absence of suppuration or radiolucent areas around the implants at 5-year post-surgicallyTimepoint: primary outcome measures, implant survival and prosthetic survival were evaluated based the long-term survival. Implant survival included clinical stability, patient-reported function without any discomfort, infection, and absence of suppuration or radiolucent areas around the implants at 5-year post-surgically | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcome measures were checked for the marginal bone level and incidence of complications. The marginal bone level was evaluated at 5 years of function in comparison with that of baseline reading recorded at the time of restoration. Marginal bone was measured using the digital image of an intraoral radiograph of each implant region, and assessment was done in the Carestream software.Timepoint: 5 years | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactRamesh chowdhary
Rajarajeswari Dental college
Outcome results
None listed