Treatment of periodontal defects with autogenous tooth graft vs demineralised bone matrix

Comparative evaluation of autogenous tooth graft vs demineralized bone matrix in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/10/028467

Enrollment

Registered

2020-10-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Periodontal osseous defects: Bone regeneration is evaluated after 9 months Control Intervention1: Periodontal osseous defects: Bone formation is evaluated after 9 months

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients having a periodontal pocket with probing depth >=5 mm Clinical attachment loss (CAL) >=5 mm Radiographic evidence of periodontal osseous defects Patient having any tooth meant for extraction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Those who had undergone any type of regenerative periodontal therapy 6 months prior to the initial examination Patients with any systemic illness Patients who are pregnant or lactating, allergic to materials and drugs used or prescribed in this study History of smoking and alcohol

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Bone formation at 6 monthsTimepoint: Bone formation at 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Bone formationTimepoint: 9 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactD jayasri varalakshmi

st joseph dental college

plaque3456@gmail.com9347477355

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026