FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare digital and regular impressions accuracy in case of individuals completely lacking teeth

A comparative evaluation between accuracy of intraoral digital and conventional completely edentulous arch impressions: An in vivo study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/10/028407
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-10-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Digital impressions: Digital impressions on completely edentulous maxillary arches using Intraoral scanner (TRIOS3, 3Shape AS Denmark) Control Intervention1: Conventional impression: Co

Sponsors

Dr Aarushi Anand
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Completely edentulous patients with healthy soft tissues

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Subjects with congenital anomalies/malformations 2) Previous orthognathic surgery 3) Allergic to impression material 4) Bony and soft tissue protuberances, active lesions, deformity or scars and trauma of the palate. 5)Patients with inadequate mouth opening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the accuracy of conventional and digital methods for generating full arch impressions in completely edentulous patientsTimepoint: 2 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comfort and acceptability of digital impressions by patientsTimepoint: 2 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aarushi Anand

Rajarajeswari Dental College and Hospital

gautamshettydental@gmail.com9886012845

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026