Skip to content

To compare the efficacy of lasers of two different wavelengths (810 nm and 577 nm) for the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy.

Comparing 532 nm subthreshold micropulse laser with 810 nm subthreshold micropulse laser in treatment of non-resolving central serous chorioretinopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/10/028374
Enrollment
198
Registered
2020-10-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: H357- Separation of retinal layers

Interventions

Intervention1: 532 nm laser: 532-nm subthreshold micropulse laser with the following laser settings will be used: power 30% of threshold power after titration
200â??ms duration
5% duty cycle
and slit lamp (aerial) spot size of 100â??μm. Area centralis contact lens will be used to deliver the laser in a confluent fashion to the focal area of leakage seen on FFA. Control Intervention1: 810
and slit lamp (aerial) spot size of 100â??μm. Area centralis contact lens will be used to deliver the laser in a confluent fashion to the focal area of leakage seen on FFA.

Sponsors

Armed Forces Medical Research Cell
Lead Sponsor
Armed Forces Medical Research Cell
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (i) Vision loss for a duration of minimum 3 months due to persistent CSC (ii) Focal leaks (upto two leaks) on fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) chronic CSCR characterized by RPE atrophy, diffuse leak on FFA; (2) history of treatment for CSCR in the past; (3) multiple leaks on FFA; (4) any other vitreoretinal disorder currently or in the past; (5) any intraocular procedure in the past 6 months; (6) systemic or topical steroid therapy currently/ in the past 6 months; (7) presence of opaque media likely to affect quality of imaging; (8) spherical equivalent ⩾± 6D.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Resolution of subretinal fluid.Timepoint: 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(i) To compare the functional outcome of the treatment assessed by best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). (ii) To report any ocular adverse effect in either treatment arm. Timepoint: 1,2,3, and 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVikas Ambiya

Command Hospital, Alipore Road, Kolkata

vikasambiya@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026