Skip to content

Different methods to give good cosmesis and quality of life after breast cancer surgery

Comparison of Quality of life, cosmesis and oncological outcomes of skin sparing mastectomy with total breast reconstruction using autologous fat grafting versus skin sparing mastectomy with silicone implant reconstruction versus breast conservative therapy among patients with early breast cancer: A Randomized controlled trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/10/028355
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-10-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C508- Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of breast

Interventions

Intervention1: SSM with Silicon implant: After removal of Breast tumor and parenchyma, Skin envelop will be preserved. Silicon Implant will be placed. Intervention2: SSM with autologous fat grafting:

Sponsors

Department of Surgical Disciplines
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Breast cancer with tumour of size less than or equal to 4cm 2. Age >18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Tumour size > 4cm 2. Skin or chest wall involved 3. Metastatic disease 4. Multicentric disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of lifeTimepoint: baseline, 1 and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Cosmetic outcome 2.Post operative complications 3.Locoregional recurrence in breast, axilla or supraclavicular fossa. Timepoint: 1 and 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Swathi Prakash J

AIIMS, New Delhi

j.swathiprakash@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026