FindTrial
Sign In

Using Ultrasound guided marking for one side of the midline ( paramedian)and comparing it with conventional midline approach at L5-S1 and assessment of the success of sub arachnoid block

Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Marking for Paramedian Approach versus Conventional Midline Approach at L5-S1 on the success of Subarachnoid Block

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/10/028312
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-10-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system Health Condition 2: N00-N99- Diseases of the genitourinary system

Interventions

Intervention1: Anaesthetic: Ultrasound guided marking for paramedian approach versus conventional midline approach at L5- S1 on the success of Subarachnoid block Control Intervention1: NA: NA Control

Sponsors

Dr Rajendra Dayabhai Patel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Asa grade 1 and 2 patients Surgeries below umbilicus

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal of the patient Any local infection at the site Presence of any coagulopathy Allergy to any local anaesthetic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Successful dural puncture in first pass by midline approach at L5-S1 to ultrasound marking guided paramedian approach at L5-S1Timepoint: 0min.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Successful dural puncture in first two passes, first two attempts , and complications such as bradycardia, hypotension , bloody tap , failure to perform spinal anaesthesia.Timepoint: 0min, and till the surgery lasts—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVemulapalli Sridivya

Seth GS Medical College

sridivya94@gmail.com8851248730

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026