FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using 3 different techniques in normal population

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with ultrasound pachymetry, anterior segment optical coherence tomography and specular microscopy.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/09/028167
Enrollment
355
Registered
2020-09-30
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Sankara eye hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)BCVA 20/20 2)Abscence of ocular pathology by history and dilated eye examination 3)CCT corrected IOP of <21mmHg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Previous ocular surgery 2)H/O trauma with primary repair 3)Corneal ectasia and dystrophies 4)Patients with established glaucoma and glaucoma suspects 5)On topical medications for any eye conditions 6)One eyed patients 7)High spherical refractive errors 8)High cylindrical errors 9)contact lens use 10)Diabetic patients 11)Those who did not give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Degree of systematic difference and level of agreement of Central corneal thickness measurements between Ultrasound pachymetry(UP),Anterior segment optical coherence tomography(AS OCT) and Specular microscopy(SM).Timepoint: At baseline—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Determining the interchangeability of of three devices and their measurements.Timepoint: At baseline—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPADMAPRIYA PG

SANKARA EYE HOSPITAL

kamala13@gmail.com9480362192

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026