A clinical trial to compare vibration and spray in reducing pain during oral injections in young adults

Comparative evaluation of mucosal vibration technique with topical anaesthetic spray technique to reduce pain during administration of local anesthesia - A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial in Young Adults

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/09/028135

Enrollment

Registered

2020-09-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K009- Disorder of tooth development, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Intraoral Mucosal Vibrator: Colgate proclinical 150C â?? powered tooth brush which has frequency of 20,000 strokes/minute is covered covered with sterile glove and then used to apply mu

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects aged 14-40 years 2. Subjects with no systematic disorders 3. Subjects having normal healthy gingiva 4. Subjects having no allergy to the components of drugs used in the study 5. Subjects who give a voluntary informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects who do not give informed consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain measured using Wong Bakers Faces Pain Scale (WBFPS) and Faces Legs Activity Cry and Consolability Pain Scale (FLACC)Timepoint: During local anesthesia administration	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NilTimepoint: Nil	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vishnuchandra Menon

Amrita School of Dentistry

sherinanuthomas98@gmail.com8590787895

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026