Skip to content

Comparision of two techniques of ryles tube insertion in patients undergoing laproscopic cholecystectomy

Comparative study of conventionl orogastric tube insertion with reverse sellicks technique in patients undergoing laproscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/09/028109
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-09-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: orogastric tube insertion: conventional orogastric tube insertion with reverse sellicks technique in patients undergoing laproscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia Control Int

Sponsors

Dr RPGMC Tanda
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy ASA I and ASA II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients refusal patients with ASA III and ASA IV nasal or maxillofacial deformity deformity of chin, larynx or pharynx base of skull lesion, upper airway lesions history of radiotherapy in head and neck region history of cervical spine disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare ease of OGT insertion in conventional with reverse sellicks technique in terms of Success of first attempt OGT insertion for two techniques Alternative maneuvers required 1. Deflation of endotracheal tube cuff. 2. Laryngoscope guided OGT insertion with Maggills forcep assistance. 3. ETT guided OGT placementTimepoint: 2 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of difficulty of orogastric tube insertion with CL grading in general anesthesia. Any complications like trauma/ bleeding.Timepoint: 2 hours

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Urvashi Nautiyal

Dr rpgmc tanda

dr.bhandari@yahoo.co.in9805135129

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026