Skip to content

Comparison between two lung function testing devices:impulse oscillometry and Forced oscillation technique (Brand name: Antlia)

A real life comparison of Jaegers Impulse Oscillometry (IOS) with Forced Oscillation (FOT, Brand name Antlia device)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/09/027987
Enrollment
180
Registered
2020-09-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J453- Mild persistent asthma Health Condition 2: J454- Moderate persistent asthma Health Condition 3: J44- Other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Health Condition 4: J455- Severe persistent asthma

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

BIRAC
Lead Sponsor
Caltech Innovations Pvt Ltd
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Healthy (20 to 75 years) 2) Asthma (20 to 75 years) 3) COPD (40 to 75 years)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Pregnant women. • Hemoptysis of unknown origin, pneumothorax, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, thoracic aneurysms, abdominal aneurysms, cerebral aneurysms, recent eye surgery (within 2 weeks due to increased intraocular pressure during forced expiration), abdominal or thoracic surgical procedures within past 1 month, and patients with a history of syncope associated with forced exhalation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To evaluate the agreement between Jaegerâ??s IOS and FOT (Brand name: Antlia) by using Bland Altman plots.Timepoint: 1/2 visits

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correlation between Spirometry parameters with FOT parametersTimepoint: Visit 1

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNitin Vanjare

Caltech

vanjare.nitin@icaltech.com09970537116

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026