Skip to content

Efficacy of beauti sealnt compared to embrace wet bond sealant.

Efficacy of Geomer technology (beauti sealant) compared to Hydrophilic technology (embrace wet bond sealant)- A randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/09/027912
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-09-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Schofu Beautisealant: Pit and fissure sealant with Geomer technology Control Intervention1: Embrace wetbond: Pit and fissure sealant with Hydrophilic technology

Sponsors

BChaitanyaBharathi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Subjects between age group of 11-13 years 2. A Deep occlusal surface, fissure or incisal lingual pit is present.3.The area selected is confined to a full erupted fossa, even though the distal fossa is impossible to seal due time inadequate eruption 4.The fossa selected for sealant placement is well isolated from another fossa with a restoration 5.subjects who will ready to follow the instructions during study period. 6.subjects who willing to participate in the study with written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Subject behavior does not permit use of adequate dry field techniques through the procedure. 2.An open carious lesion3.Caries exist on other surface of the same tooth in which restoring will disrupt an intact sealant 4.A large restoration is already present. 6.History of any adverse reaction to any of the restorative material used 7.History of abnormal parafunctional activity 8.Heavy occlusal contacts on the teeth to be restored 9.History of any medical disease that might interfere with the study 10. Highly uncooperative child

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Retention,Anatomic contour,Marginal integrity,Surface texture,Secondary cariesTimepoint: 1 month 3 month 6 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Retention,Anatomic contour,Marginal integrity,Surface texture,Secondary cariesTimepoint: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactChaitanya Bharathi

N.T.R university

dr.chandu@gmail.com9246482426

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026