FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of changes in TMJ joint by 2 fixed functional appliance

A comparative evaluation of changes in TMJ morphology in skeletal Class II patients treated with AdvanSync and Herbst appliance - A CBCT Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/09/027872
Enrollment
15
Registered
2020-09-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K008- Other disorders of tooth development

Interventions

Intervention1: Advansync appliance: A fixed functional appliance that can be used in conjunction with complete fixed orthodontic appliances. Advansync is effective in correcting class II malocclusion

Sponsors

Dr Palak Shah
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient in CVMI stages 2,3, and 4 2. Class II malocclusion (ANB >4ï?°) 3. Horizontal or normal growth pattern 4. Minimum crowding in dental arches 5. Positive visual treatment objective (VTO).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who do not have Class II malocclusion 2. Patients with systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in TMJ morphology will be assessed by CBCTTimepoint: at baseline and then at 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Correction of Class II malocclusion will be assessed by CBCTTimepoint: at baseline i.e, before the start of the treatment and after 6 months.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPalak Shah

SGT university

prabhakarmona@gmail.com9810131064

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026