Skip to content

comparision of preformed metal crown using hall technique and conventional technique

To compare the effectiveness of preformed metal crowns (PMCs) using Hall technique and conventional technique based on clinical and radiographic criteria.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/09/027577
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-09-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: preformed metal crown: preformed metal crown over proximaly carious primary molars Control Intervention1: N/A: N/A

Sponsors

sgt University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •Children in the age group of 4-8 years •Children without any evidence of systemic disease. •Carious primary molar with class 1 and class 2 cavities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: •Children with compromised medical history. •Teeth with caries extended in pulp either from clinical and radiographic examination. •Teeth with sign and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or dental abscess.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
not applicableTimepoint: not applicable

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
N/ATimepoint: N/A

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactsushma yadav

sgt university

sushmagunnu@gmail.com8059527372

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026