Skip to content

A Single Center study To Assess Outcomes And Complications Of Conventional Stent (tube placed between kidney and bladder) Placement Versus No Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy ( procedure to break stones in the ureter) For lower ureteric stone Of Size Less Than 1 cms.

A Single Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study To Assess Outcomes And Complications Of Conventional Stent Placement Versus No Stent Placement After Ureteroscopy For Distal Ureteric Calculus Of Size Less Than 1 cms.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/09/027530
Enrollment
104
Registered
2020-09-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N201- Calculus of ureter

Interventions

Intervention1: Avoiding Placement of Conventional Double J Stent in Post URSL In Distal Ureteric Calculus Of Size Less Than 1 cms.: Avoiding Placement of Conventional Double J Stent in Post URSL In Di

Sponsors

Department of Urology Kasturba Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Study group: Patients of age >18 years attending Urology Department with Distal ureteric calculus of size less than 1 cms undergoing URS WITHOUT STENTING. Control Group: Patients of age >18 years attending Urology Department with Distal ureteric calculus of size less than 1 cms undergoing URS WITH STENTING.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children and Pregnant women. Patients with systemic signs of infection (sepsis) Patients with a solitary kidney. Patients undergoing bilateral procedures. Patients with anatomical abnormalities (horseshoe kidney, pelvic kidney, etc.), and transplant patients. Procedures complicated by perforation of the ureter or gross bleeding. Patients who had a pre-existing ureteral stent at the time of ureteroscopy. Patients in whom stone fragments are not completely retrieved during primary URSL.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To Compare the Outcomes and Complications in Patients who undergo Stent Placement versus No Stent Placement following Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteric Calculus. Timepoint: 1 Month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To Study the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms In Patients Undergoing Stent Placement and No Stent Placement Post Procedure To Assess the Rate of Emergency Admissions in Patients Undergoing Stent Placement and No Stent Placement Post Procedure To assess the presence of Sexual Dysfunction in patients undergoing Stent Placement and No Stent Placement Post Procedure . Timepoint: 1 Month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSuraj J

KMC- MANIPAL

urologyarun@yahoo.com9008002440

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026