FindTrial
Sign In

Erector spinae block vs epidural block in patients undergoing surgery for gall bladder cancer

Feasibility of USG erector spinae block as an alternative to epidural block in patients undergoing extended cholecystectomy for carcinoma gall bladder

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/08/027404
Enrollment
70
Registered
2020-08-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C23- Malignant neoplasm of gallbladder

Interventions

Intervention1: USG Guided Erector spinae block-Group 1: The patient will be shifted to the operating room and all standard ASA monitors will be attached and baseline vitals like blood pressure, heart

Sponsors

PGIMER CHANDIGARH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with diagnosed carcinoma gall bladder, (ASA1,2 ) undergoing extended cholecystectomy will be enrolled in this study. Written and informed consent for the study process will be obtained prior to enrollment from the patient or the legal guardian.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) morbid obesity 2) allergy to local anesthetic agents 3) refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare post operative pain scores between erector spinae and epidural block using NRS pain scoring system.Timepoint: 1st hour, 6th hour,12th hour, 24 hour—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Total opioid consumption, hypotension, nausea vomiting, and any complication arising from ESP and epidural blockTimepoint: 1st hour, 6th hour,12th hour, 24 hour—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSANJAY KUMAR

PGIMER CHANDIGARH

sanjayjaswal247@gmail.com9779170944

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026