Increase of Crown length using scalpel and comparison with Microscope assisted surgery

clinical assessment of crown lengthening procedure performed under conventional and surgical operating microscope- A comparative analysis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/08/027271

Enrollment

Registered

2020-08-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: conventional: microscope Intervention2: microsurgical: crown legthening done under miccroscope with microsurgica

instruments Intervention3: Conventional surgical procedure: crown lengthening done Conventional surgical approach and parameters meausred at 3 months intervel Control Intervention1: Microsurgical appr

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Periodontally healthy patients requiring crown lengthening for restoration. Includes either anterior or posterior teeth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic diseases that contraindicate periodontal surgery. Active gingival and periodontal diseases smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Probing depth Clinical attachment level (measure from reference point on stent to the base of pocket ) Position of gingival margin Biologic width Bone level VAS scale Early wound healing index Timepoint: 3 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
plaque score gingival indexTimepoint: 3 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGautmi S Penmetsa

Vishnu Dental College

gautamipenmetsa@gmail.com

Outcome results