Health Condition 1: C719- Malignant neoplasm of brain, unspecified
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Comparison of Ultrasound guided versus Palpatory method of posterior tibial artery cannulation: After induction of general anesthesia, all aseptic precautions will be taken and a 20G ar
Sponsors
AIIMS RISHIKESH
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA grade I - IV Patients undergoing major surgeries requiring arterial cannulation
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient refusal to consent. 2.Patient with absence of arterial pulsation. 3.Skin erosions near the insertion site. 4.Patient undergoing surgery on lower limbs. 5.Patients with peripheral vascular disease.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the success rate of ultrasound guided versus conventional Palpatory method of posterior tibial artery cannulation for first time successful cannulation. Timepoint: This is not applicable as single reading will be taken at the time of intra arterial cannulation. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. To compare the number of attempts. 2. To compare the assessment time. 3. To compare the cannulation time. 4. To compare Cannulation failure. 5. To compare the complication with multiple attempts like spasm, thrombosis, necrosis. Timepoint: This is not applicable as single time reading will be taken at the time of intra arterial cannulation. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDR PRIYANKA GUPTA
DEPARTMENT OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, AIIMS, RISHIKESH
Outcome results
None listed