FindTrial
Sign In

supraglottic airway devices

Comparison of three different supraglottic airway devices in prone position- A manikin based randomized study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/08/027143
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-08-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: supraglottic airway devices management: Comparison of three different supraglottic airway devices was done.IGel, CLMA and PLMA was performed by 40 residents on manikin and median time t

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All the senior residents of Department of Anaesthesiology, who have successfully inserted all three supraglottic airway device in atleast 50 patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Senior residents who have not inserted any of the three supraglottic airway devices in atleast 50 patients will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To determine the most appropriate device for securing aaaaairway in prone position during accidental extubation aaaain terms of â?¢ Ease of insertion Timepoint: Till the point of supraglottic airways device insertion—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Time taken to secure airway 2. Ease of ventilationTimepoint: Till the point of supraglottic airways device insertion—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Babita Gupta

All India Institute of medical sciences, New Delhi

drbabitagupta@hotmail.com09868397815

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026