FindTrial
Sign In

A Study to compare the Efficacy and complications of endoscopic cut in the Prostate(TUIP) versus endoscopic Removal Of small pieces of Prostate(TURP) in the management of less than 25cc Benign Prostatic Enlargement

A Randomized, Prospective Study to compare the Efficacy and complications of Transurethral Incision of Prostate(TUIP) versus Transurethral Resection Of Prostate(TURP) in the management of less than 25cc Benign Prostatic Enlargement

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/08/027056
Enrollment
120
Registered
2020-08-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N398- Other specified disorders of urinary system

Interventions

Intervention1: TUIP in patients with LUTS secondary to BPE (less than 25CC): TUIP in patients with LUTS secondary to BPE (LESS THAN 25CC). This is a single stage procedure and pt will be followed for

Sponsors

Department of Urology KMC manipal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients having bothersome LUTS with IPSS > 15 after medical treatment or patients who are not willing for medical management. Qmax on uroflowmetry less than or equal to 8ml/sec. PSA Prostatic urethra length Size of prostate gland on transabdominal USG less than 25cc DRE findings of Benign Gland

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of Median lobe on cystoscopy Age less than 50 years or older than 80 years Patients with a PVR > 300 ml Patients who cannot void > 150 ml Patients with a suspicion of neurologic bladder dysfunction ( like Parkinson disease, history of spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis , uncontrolled DM , history of cerebrovascular events , etc ) Previous history of urethral or prostatic surgery Previous history of radical pelvic surgery Patient not willing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
-To comparing the efficacy of Transurethral Incision Of Prostate versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate in the management of less than 25cc Benign Prostatic Enlargement. - To compare the improvement in IPSS score and flow rates in both groups - To compare the rate of complications in both groups - To assess the need of readmission or re-surgery in patients undergoing TUIP and TURP Timepoint: 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the improvement in IPSS score and flow rates in patients undergoing TUIP and TURP - To compare the rate of complications in Transurethral Incision of Prostate versus Transurethral Resection of Prostate in the management of less than 25cc Benign Prostatic Enlargement. - To assess the need of readmission or re-surgery in patients undergoing TUIP and TURP - Assessment of the effect of procedure on the sexual function Timepoint: 3 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGurvansh Singh Sachdev

KMC Manipal

padmaraj.hegde@manipal.edu9719641929

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026