Skip to content

Comparison of different methods of assessing normal forms of spermatozoa.

Invasive and non invasive sperm morphology assessment in addressing nuclear integrity

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/07/026928
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-07-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R37- Sexual dysfunction, unspecified

Interventions

Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Department of Clinical Embryology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All men who are able to provide an ejaculate will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Azoospermic men will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison between different morphology assessment methods with nuclear integrity will enable us to suggest the suitability of methods to apply in clinical ART practice.Timepoint: One month from the collection of the material

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Better method of sperm morphology assessment to be employed in ART clinicsTimepoint: 11-02-2020 to 10-02-2021

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Satish Kumar Adiga

Kasturba Medical College

satish.adiga@manipal.edu9945671115

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026