FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of haemodynamic response to Retractor insertion in Robotic surgery with Endotrachael intubation

Comparison of Haemodynamic response following EF Retractor insertion with Endotrachael intubation in Patients undergoing Transoral Robotic Surgery(TORS): A Prospective Observational Study. - TORS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/07/026857
Enrollment
80
Registered
2020-07-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C069- Malignant neoplasm of mouth, unspecified

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

PGIMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing TORS for oral cavity pathologies. 2. ASA category I and II 3. Age 18-60 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing Robotic assisted ENT surgeries for other than oral cavity cancers. 2. ASA category III and above.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate Haemodynamic changes to FE Retractor insertionTimepoint: baseline, at intubation , at retractor insertion , at interval of 5 mins upto 30 mins amd then at interval of 10 mins till end of surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Any other Complications, MAC increase during Retractor insertion and Post Retractor insertionTimepoint: following intubation an retractor insertion every 5 minutes and every 10 mins after 1retractor insertion till end of surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDeepanshu Dhiman

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciencesa

panshu88@gmail.com9646308822

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026