FindTrial
Sign In

â??The efficacy of Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block versus Quadratus Lumborum in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study"

â??The efficacy of Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block versus Quadratus Lumborum block for post operative analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study"

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/07/026739
Enrollment
56
Registered
2020-07-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z768- Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block
Quadratus Lumborum in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal surgeries: patients will be randomly allocated into group A and B GROUP A: With the patient in supine position under strict aseptic pre

Sponsors

Dr Roshni Benedicta
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients in the age group of 20-59 years(ASA I-II) scheduled for various lower abdominal surgeries under subarachnoid block

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Known history of hypersensitivity to drugs used 2.History of significant cardiac, respiratory, renal, hepatic or central nervous system diseases 3.Infection at the site of the block 4.History of coagulopathy or anticoagulant medication intake •Patients on chemotherapy & radiation therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.To compare the efficacy of USG-guided bilateral QL block versus bilateral USG -guided TAP block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing various lower abdominal surgeries using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS) 2.To compare the time to rescue analgesia SECONDARY 1.To compare the adverse outcomes of both the procedures 2.to evaluate patient satisfaction Timepoint: All patients will be monitored at 0,1, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours for the above-mentioned parameters. Patients will be asked to rate the pain they experience on a visual analogue scale (NPIS) from zero to ten, 0 being â??no painâ?? and 10 being â??very severe painâ??, time for first rescue dose of intravenous pethidine 0.5mg/kg body weight will be noted in both the groups and subsequent number of doses required over 24 hours will also be noted.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
SECONDARY To compare the adverse outcomes of both the procedures To evaluate patient satisfaction Timepoint: All patients will be monitored at 0,1, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours for the above-mentioned parameters. Patients will be asked to rate the pain they experience on a visual analogue scale (NPIS) from zero to ten, 0 being â??no painâ?? and 10 being â??very severe painâ??, time for first rescue dose of intravenous pethidine 0.5mg/kg body weight will be noted in both the groups and subsequent number of doses required over 24 hours will also be noted.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRoshni benedicta

St. Johns medical college

geetjui@gmail.com9916710067

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026