Skip to content

Comparing effect of supplemental oxygen on patient oxygenation status compared to standard technique during general anaesthesia administration

Comparison of the efficacy of nasal oxygen supplementation technique to standard technique, on safe apnoea time during induction of GA- RCT - NOSAT

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/07/026723
Enrollment
52
Registered
2020-07-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z768- Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances

Interventions

Intervention1: Nasal oxygen supplementation: intervention group- O2 at 5L/min through nasal cannula, while non intervention standard care group- no supplemental O2 Control Intervention1: No suppleme

Sponsors

Mosc Medical college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing GA with tracheal tube, controlled ventilation.BMI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: pregnant patients, anticipated difficult airway, chronic cardio respiratory disease, nasal obstruction, elevated ICP, GORD, SpO2 <97 % preinduction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to desaturation to 95% during simulated laryngoscopy noted with and without nasal O2 Timepoint: Time in minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time to resaturation to 100% after manual ventilation noted with and without nasal O2. Lowest saturation reached during actual laryngoscopy noted with and without nasal O2 Timepoint: Time in minutes

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactManjit George

MOSC Medical College

manjitgeorge@gmail.com00919447411536

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026