Skip to content

Comparison to two different position to relieve difficulty in breathing in COVID- 19 patients

Awake Prone Position Versus Repeated Position Change in Moderate to Severe COVID-19 patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/07/026532
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-07-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: B972- Coronavirus as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: Repeated Position Change: One hour right lateral, two hours prone and one hour left lateral Control Intervention1: Awake Prone Positioning: Awake Prone Positioning for 4h in patients pr

Sponsors

Dr Souvik Maitra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients (aged between 18 and 75y) with laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, presenting with self-reported symptom of shortness of breath will be included in this trial after informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who refuse to participate, hemodynamically unstable patients, pregnant patients and patients requiring mechanical ventilation will be excluded from this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare repeated positioning with 4h continuous prone positioning in terms of self-reported dyspnea in a 10- point visual analogue scaleTimepoint: 4hour since randomization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare both the techniques in terms of oxygenation status (room air oxyhemoglobin saturation or PaO2/FiO2 ratio in arterial blood gas) 2. To compare the requirement of rescue therapy (high flow nasal oxygen) in both the groups. 3. To compare hemodynamic variables in both the groups. 4. To compare the requirement of mechanical ventilation within 24h in both the groups. 5. To compare the change in respiratory rate in both the groups. Timepoint: 4 hour since randomization

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Souvik Maitra

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

souvikmaitra@live.com08146727891

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026