Comparative study between two methods of bone lengthening in leg

Comparative study between bone transport technique and induced membrane technique in management of bone defects in the tibia -a randomized control trial.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/07/026485

Enrollment

Registered

2020-07-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M897- Major osseous defect

Interventions

Intervention1: Induced membrane technique: Masquelet technique itâ??s a two staged surgery in 1st stage gross debridment done bone fixed internally or externally with antibiotic mixed bone cement, in

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and 2 No severe soft tissue loss

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: More than ASA 2 Extensive soft tissue loss Vascular injury Patient refusal

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Clinical and radiological outcome of two intervention using ASAMI scoringTimepoint: Clinical and radiological outcome of two intervention using ASAMI scoring at 2 months then 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Bone union in different age group , CRP PaternTimepoint: 2monthly for 6 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr amit kumar majhee

Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences

gkgupta1975@yahoo.co.in7979014287

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026