FindTrial
Sign In

A randomised controlled study to compare the effect of antibiotic infiltration at the incision site, in preventing surgical site infections in emergency midline surgeries.

COMPARISON OF EFFECT OF CEFTRIAXONE IN-FILTRATION BEFORE INCISION AND BEFORE CLOSURE IN LAPAROTOMY FOR PERFORATION PERITONITIS â??A RANDOMIZED CONTROL STUDY.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/07/026302
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-07-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K631- Perforation of intestine (nontraumatic) Health Condition 3: K631- Perforation of intestine (nontraumatic)

Interventions

Intervention1: Ceftriaxone infiltration before incision and before closure in laprotomy for perforation peritonitis.: Comparison of effect of ceftriaxone infiltration before incision and before closur

Sponsors

MAULANA AZAD MEDICAL COLLEGE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients diagnosed with perforation peritonitis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Diabetes Mellitus. On immunosuppresive therapy. BMI > 35 Kg/m2 Sensitivity to ceftriaxone. Previous midline abdominal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Effect of ceftriaxone infiltration before incision and before closure in preventing SSITimepoint: Effect of ceftriaxone infiltration before incision and before closure in preventing SSI on postoperative day 7.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of hospital stay.Timepoint: Time duration—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPAWAN LAL

MAULANA AZAD MEDICAL COLLEGE

pawanlal@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026