Comparing two techniques for intubation in difficult airway patients

Comparative evaluation of ease of intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airway and videolaryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airway

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/06/026234

Enrollment

Registered

2020-06-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M219- Unspecified acquired deformity oflimb and hand Health Condition 2: M219- Unspecified acquired deformity oflimb and hand

Interventions

Intervention1: endotracheal intubation: 3 attempts Under general anaesthesia Intervention2: endotracheal intubation: intubation using intubating lma Control Intervention1: Number of attempts duration

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade 1 and 2 modified mallampati class 3 interincisor distance more than or equal to 30 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: risk of aspiration allergy to drugs history of reactive airway disease cervical spine deformities

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
ease of insertion and insertion successTimepoint: 10-30 seconds	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
heart rate blood pressureTimepoint: baseline prior to induction prior to intubation 1 3 5 7 mins after intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAsmita V C

ABVIMS and DR RML HOSPITAL

drvinoddhir@gmail.com09868223931

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026