Analysis of two different types of airway devices in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery

Randomised comparative analysis of Baska LMA vs Proseal LMA in patients requiring general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation for laproscopic ambulatory gynaecological surgery.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/06/026089

Enrollment

Registered

2020-06-24

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: BASKA Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA): A novel LMA which incorporates the benefits of 4 other LMA s into one . we are studying this new LMA for efficacy of ventilation and prevention of asp

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing laproscopic gynaecological surgeries like diagnostic hysterolaproscopies and laproscopic sterilisation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Anticipated difficult airways and neck pathologies BMI > 35 High risk of aspiration

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To measure the airway sealing pressure of the Baska LMA and Proseal LMA Timepoint: At the time of insertion of LMA and 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum and trendlenberg	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
(i) Compare speed and ease of insertion of the two devices (ii) compare number of attempts to place the devices (iii) assess the adequacy of ventilation (iv) assess postoperative dysphagia, hoarseness or sore throat Timepoint: At the time of insertion 1 hour after device removal	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnju Thomas

Christian Medical College Vellore

thomasanjusarah@gmail.com7639537582

Outcome results