Clinical Comparison Of Zirconia Crown With Glass Reinforced Fibre Composite Crown (Gfrc)

Comparative assessment of the Clinical Efficacy in Zirconia crown and Glass Reinforced Composite Crown (GFRC) in Primary Molar Teeth-Split Mouth Randomised Prospective Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/06/026051

Enrollment

Registered

2020-06-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified Health Condition 2: K00-K14- Diseases of oral cavity and salivary glands

Interventions

Intervention1: Figaro Crowns: Glass Reinforced Fibre Composite Crowns for Primary Teeth Figaro Texas USA Control Intervention1: NuSmile Crowns: Preformed Zirconia Crowns For Primary Teeth NuSmile T

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: subjects requiring crown placement after endodontic treatment, multi surface restorations, fractured teeth, teeth with extensive wear and or abutment for space maintainer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth indicated for extraction, extensive mobility & root resorption and parents refusing to give consent to participate in study were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
GFRC crown group clinical performance need to be assessed Timepoint: one week three months six moths twelve months eighteen months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Gingival health, staining, plaque retention, occlusal wear, parents acceptanceTimepoint: one week three months six moths twelve months eighteen months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Gayatri Chaudhari

M A RANGOONAWALA DENTAL COLLEGE PUNE

drabhinavtalekar@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026