Skip to content

Its a study where we will compare conventional, pulsed and combined radiofrequency for the treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Comparative evaluation of conventional,pulsed and combined radiofrequency for the treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/06/026031
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-06-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G500- Trigeminal neuralgia

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional radiofrequency ablation for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: Patient will be administered flouroscopically guided conventional radiofrequency ablation for the treatment o

Sponsors

Anaesthesia and critical care department
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients aged between 18-60 years of either sex suffering from trigeminal neuralgia as diagnosed by the criteria given by International Headache Society 2018.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with infection at the local site,history of coagulopahy,raised intracranial pressure,aberrant congenital or surgical anatomy,history of psychiatric disorder including schizophrenia or acute anxiety.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain score Timepoint: Pain score three months after the proedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction.Timepoint: Patient satisfaction one hour before,one hour after,two weeks after,one month after and three months after the procedure.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Aakrutee Mohanty

Pt.B.D.Sharma PGIMS,Rohtak.

aakrutee.mohanty@gmail.com9438734308

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026