Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: 4- Measurement and Monitoring
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Tuoren video laryngoscope: Tuoren video laryngoscope has not been studied in manual in line stabilisation
Control Intervention1: KING VISION VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE: Comparison of tracheal i
Sponsors
Jawaharlal Institue of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research JIPMER
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients scheduled for elective surgeries requiring general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation 2. American social Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification grade I to III, age between 18 to 70 years
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1.BMI greater than or equal to 30 2. Limitation of neck extension 3. Craniofacial anomaly 4. Upper airway disease 5. Cervical spine pathology 6. An increased risk of regurgitation or pulmonary aspiration 7. History of difficult tracheal intubation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the rate of successful first attempt intubation with King vision video laryngoscope and Tuoren video laryngoscopes with manual inline stabilisation.Timepoint: Time taken for insertion of laryngoscope blade till appearance of capnography square waveform in the monitor | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1.To compare time required for intubation between two groups 2. To measure intubation difficulty score between two groups 3. To compare haemodynamic response in both groups 4 . To compare POGO scoreTimepoint: 1. Time taken for insertion of laryngoscope blade till appearance of capnography square wave form in monitor 2. IDS score 3. To compare haemodynamic response using mean arterial pressure and heart rate 4. Percentage of glottis opening score | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Killo Ramesh
Jawaharlal Institue of Postgraduate Medical and Research (JIPMER)
Outcome results
None listed