FindTrial
Sign In

Comparision between automated feeding and nurse led feeding in neonates

Comparison of time taken for feeding stable preterm babies between regular nurse feeding and feeding with feed rail â?? Randomized control study - Feed rail

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/06/025958
Enrollment
40
Registered
2020-06-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: P073- Preterm [premature] newborn [other]

Interventions

Intervention1: Feed rail: an automated feeding device is used to feed stable pretrem neonates and compare with the standard nasogastric feeding technique Control Intervention1: Nasogastric feeding: In

Sponsors

JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Babies weighing less than 2 kg, tolerating oral feeds and with at least 50% of their nutritional requirement through gavage were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Sick neonates on ventilator and ionotropes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the time taken and variation in feeding rate between automated feed rail and nurse led gravity feeding.Timepoint: At the end of each feeding event—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrDeepti Thandaveshwara

JSS Medical College

deeptiadarsh@gmail.com9845023309

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026