Comparison of King vision videolaryngoscopy and Direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in children

Comparative analysis of endotracheal intubation with king vision ablade videolaryngoscopy with Direct laryngoscopy in pediatric population : A Prospective Randomised Control Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2020/06/025915

Enrollment

150

Registered

2020-06-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Direct Laryngoscopy: Endotracheal Intubation in pediatric population with Miller/Macintosh Direct laryngoscopy Intervention2: Video laryngoscopy: Endotracheal Intubation in pediatric p

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia ASA physical status I-II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Congenital anomalies URTI and LRTI ASA > II

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time to intubationTimepoint: Time from entry of laryngoscope blade past the lip to observation of first end tidal capnograpy after successful tracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Number of intubation attempts East of intubation Overall intubation success rate Haemodynamic changesTimepoint: Intraoperative period	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chaya Devi D

Dr.Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Sciences

mamtaharjaidoctor@yahoo.co.in

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026