Skip to content

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BLOOD FLOW STABILITY IN THE BODY THROUGH INTRAOPERATIVE FLUID ADMINISTRATION BY CONVENTIONAL VERSUS A NOVEL METHOD IN SPINE SURGERY.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HEMODYNAMIC STABILITY THROUGH INTRAOPERATIVE FLUID ADMINISTRATION GUIDED BY STROKE VOLUME VARIATION ASSESSMENT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS IN TERMS OF INFERIOR VENA CAVA DIAMETER AND COLLAPSIBILITY INDEX DURING SPINE SURGERY.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2020/06/025723
Enrollment
70
Registered
2020-06-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S331- Subluxation and dislocation of lumbar vertebra

Interventions

Intervention1: intraoperative fluid administration: intraoperative fluid administration guided by stroke volume variation versus conventional parameters. Duration of therapy-6 months. Control Interven

Sponsors

salini mukhopadhyay
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 18-50 years ASA Grade I Undergoing elective spinal surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of psychiatric/neurologic illness Pregnant and nursing women Patients with significant abnormality of vital organ system Patients on beta blockers, anticonvulsants and other centrally acting medications Patients with known allergy to any of the study medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ivc diameter and collapsibility indexTimepoint: before the surgery and within first hour of postoperative period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
pulse rate blood pressure urine outputTimepoint: during the surgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmita Acharjee

Bangur institute of neurosciences,ipgmer

dr.amitaacharya@yahoo.com9831650768

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026