Health Condition 1: 2- Placement
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: I-gel: Comparison of Ease of Insertion of Classic-LMA vs I-gel. 5 minute
Control Intervention1: classic LMA: Comparison of Ease of Insertion of Classic-LMA vs I-gel Supraglottic Airway
Sponsors
SMS Medical College Jaipur
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patient undergoing minor day care gynaecological surgery. Patient willing to give written and informed consent. Minimum 8 hours of fasting present. ASA grade I and II patients. Age between 18-60 years. BMI of 20-25 kg/m2
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patient with anticipated difficult airway. H/o Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease.(GERD) Patients who require more than 3 attempts for I-gel or C-LMA insertion by a single anaesthetist.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The claimed potential advantages of I-gel include ease of insertion and use with minimal tissue compression and congestion, fewer/less airway complications and more stability following insertion.5,6 A previous anatomical study in cadavers has shown that the i-gelâ?¢ is capable of achieving a good peri-laryngeal seal without the requirement for an inflatable cuff. It also has features designed to allow a gastric tube to be passed into the stomach.Timepoint: 24 hrs | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Classic LMA has been a definitive alternative to endotracheal intubation in the past few years. But it has got its limitation in restricted mouth opening, with less airway leak pressure and lack of gastric port. I-gel is a new extra glottic mask airway device with gastric access. It provides a reliable perilaryngeal seal and does not produce compressive trauma.Timepoint: 24 hrs | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Mukesh Kumar
department of anaesthesia
Outcome results
None listed